
Considering the importance of corporate carbon emissions, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and curtailed EPA’s regulatory powers by unprecedentedly invoking the “major questions doctrine” in its judgment of West Virginia v. EPA in 2022. We find that stock prices of firms with greater exposure to climate risk increased relative to firms with lower exposure after the Supreme Court verdict. The results are more pronounced for firms subject to higher federal climate enforcement intensity prior to the court ruling. Long-term zero carbon commitment by local government and environmental consciousness of institutional investors can mitigate the effect. Overall, our findings from this landmark climate litigation suggest that climate transition risks can affect stock prices.
陕晨煜
上海财经大学金融学院和滴水湖高级金融学院双聘教授,终身教职,中美富布赖特学者,香港大学金融学博士。研究领域包括ESG、公司金融和银行。研究论文发表于Journal of Finance, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Review of Finance等国内外重要期刊。论文曾多次入选美国西部金融年会(WFA), 欧洲金融年会(EFA), 金融中介研究年会(FIRS)等学术会议;获得上海市哲学社会科学学术成果二等奖、中国国际金融年会最佳论文奖(CICF Best Paper), 华人金融协会最佳论文奖(TCFA Best Paper),亚太金融市场年会杰出论文奖(CAFM Outstanding Paper)等。主持国家自然科学基金青年和面上项目。国家自然科学基金专项项目子课题负责人。担任Corporate Governance: An International Review (CGIR) 期刊编委,International Review of Finance副主编;香港政府研究资助局外部评审;Management Science,Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 《经济学(季刊)》等国内外顶级期刊审稿人。
新闻报道