主持人：赵蓉晖教授 （上海外国语大学）
评议人：潘天舒教授 （复旦大学人类学民族学研究所）
作为哈佛大学人文社科学术道德委员会委员以及活跃在世界人类学研究前沿的社会科学研究者，教授将与我们分享在学术道德审查和学术实践中参与决策与经历的真实案例，尝试提出在中国学术语境发展类似的学术道德准则，避免重蹈西方学术界覆辙，以供中国学界同仁们参考。
当今世界的人文社科研究，对“人”的研究面临比过去更严苛的学术伦理道德标准。这不仅提升了以人为对象研究的人文道德价值，实际上也提升了研究本身的质素。同时，由于人文社科研究并非使用同一类研究方法，统一的伦理道德标准，以及对研究伦理实践给予同样强有力的承诺，也会为人文社科研究制造一些难题和挑战。学术机构的伦理规则与不同文化语境下的学术实践伦理如何协商与平衡？
Around the world today, research on “human subjects” has become subject to ethical guidelines far more stringent than anything that existed in the past. This not only improves the moral value of human subjects research but also improves the quality of the research itself. At the same time, it creates some difficulties inasmuch as not all disciplines have the same methods, follow the same ethical guidelines, or have an equally strong commitment to ethical practices.
The speaker, who is a member of his university’s committee for ethical practices in the social sciences and humanities, will describe some of the issues he has encountered as a committee member and as an active social scientist in his university and will modestly suggest potential ways in which Chinese colleagues might consider developing similar codes while avoiding some of the mistakes committed in the past in the West.
新闻报道
