Session 4: The Fun—and Hard—Part: Designing methodologies, Part I
Designing content analysis, textual analysis, controlled experiments, field experiments, that are tightly based on your hypotheses/RQs. Pros and cons of each. Critiquing your and others’ methodologies through the lens of internal validity, external validity and reliability.

Session 2: Literature Reviews: The Foundation of Everything Else.
This session is about strategizing for compiling the literature review, organizing the literature review by section and within sections, writing the literature review, with exercises in writing a literature review and critiquing others’ literature reviews in detail and overall.

Session 3: : How Do I Get Here? Writing Theory-Driven Hypotheses
Writing hypotheses and/or research questions strictly based on the literature review. Independent and dependent variables. Operational definitions. Writing theory-driven hypotheses/RQs. Critiquing others’ hypotheses and research questions.

Session 1: Where Do I Start?
This session focuses on picking research topics, and narrowing or broadening them through literature review. We consider theoretical importance, practical importance and application, personal interest, and other tangible and intangible considerations. We will go through brainstorming exercises in class, also consider others’ research agendas and starting considering what kind of topics and questions are related to which theories?

法国十八世纪伟大的思想家、哲学家、教育家、文学家，杰出的民主政论家和浪漫主义文学流派的开创者，启蒙运动最卓越的代表人物之一让·雅克·卢梭在其短暂的一生中留下许多流芳百世的著作，其一便是《论科学与艺术》——1749年卢梭应第戎科学院征文而撰写的获奖论文。
正当启蒙运动如日中天之际，卢梭对启蒙运动乃至一般而言的科学与艺术持批评态度，这是卢梭留给他的同时代人甚至是当代人的最初印象。实际上，卢梭并非质疑科学和艺术本身，而是质疑它们带给道德和风俗的影响。卢梭是怎样展开他的论证的？他批评文明社会与文明人的理据是什么？科学和艺术到底能否与道德相容？这是我们需要跟随卢梭一起思考的问题。

著名史家塔西佗既倾倒于罗马政治的伟大，又深恶痛绝于帝国之下的败坏与放纵。在《阿古利可拉传》中他写道：“在我们这个时代中，风气之浊如此，对美德之冷消如此”他斥责在专制统治下对人民的奴役和对自由的剥夺。他说：“的确，我们已经充分证明的我们的柔顺屈服；如果说我们的先人亲眼见过极度放纵的自由，那么，我们真是处在极度奴役之下。我们的‘告密人’已经连我们说话和听话的权利都给剥夺了。如果健忘能够像沉默一般的容易，那么，我们会把记忆和语言都同样的抛掉。”
讲述罗马对不列颠统治的《阿古利可拉传》，笔锋犀利，直指要害，像一柄刺刀挑开罗马帝国政治的沉疴痼疾，又像一首华丽隽永的赞美诗，颂扬不列颠人这一“蛮族”的勇于战斗生气勃勃。
罗马政治之伟大与深层问题，二者必须同时关注，透过著名史家塔西佗来看罗马政治，更是上上之选。就让我们一起，跟从吴一笛老师的步伐，打开塔西佗现存五部作品之一的《阿古利可拉传》，探索其中包含着什么样的罗马政治与史家教诲。

The MATSDA/Shanghai International Studies University Conference

June 9th-10th, 2018

Teacher Development Through Materials Development

Brief Schedule of the Conference

Day 1: Saturday, June 9th, 2018

Day 2: Sunday, June 10th, 2018

本讲座将围绕以下几个话题展开叙述和诠释:1.学位论文撰写有哪些基本流程？2.学位论文如何选题？3.学位论文撰写过程中通常使用哪些语步和语阶？4．文献综述、研究方法和讨论之间是什么样的关系？讲座将紧密围绕上述四点就如何开展学术论文撰写提出一些哲学思考，勾勒出学术研究选题的基本线路图，使用经典的“铁三角”思维方式，并结合语步和语阶的思路来撰写学术论文中的摘要、引言、文献综述、概念性框架搭建、研究方法设定、研究资料收集、研究资料分析，还将结合相关具体的语步和语阶来阐述如何撰写具有深度的讨论内容，最终撰写出具有真正实质性意义和启示的结语等。

分享书目：《什么是哲学》 （西）何·奥·加塞尔著
书目简介：本书为一本小册子，趣味性较强。包括：哲学的历程、我的信念与哲学、我的命运与哲学、我而非我的哲学等11部分。作者在书中运用现象学的观点对古典哲学以至笛卡尔以来的现代哲学的各种主流思想都作了深入浅出的评述。

Topic：India, China and Emerging Trends in Global Transformation

Speaker：Dr.Manoranjan Mohanty

Time： 14:30-16:30 P.M., Thursday, June 7th,2018

Venue：5109, Songjiang Campus, SISU

Language： English

Professor Manoranjan Mohanty (b.1942) is a political scientist, China scholar and peace and human Rights activist. A Ph D. from University of California, Berkeley, he has been professor of Political Science and Director, Developing Countries Research Centre (DCRC) at the University of Delhi. He is a former Chairperson and Director of ICS and a former Editor of China Report. He has had visiting assignments in several universities and research institutes in India and abroad including UC, Berkeley, Institute of Far Eastern Studies, Moscow, Oxford University, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Beijing, Institute of Asian Studies, Copenhagen, University of Lagos, UC, Santa Barbara and New School, New York. He has many books and research papers including China’s Transformation: The Success Story and the Success Trap, Red and Green: Five Decades of the Indian Maoist Movement, Grass-roots Democracy in India and China, Chinese Revolution: Comparative Perspectives, The Political Philosophy of Mao Tse-tung and so on.