梭罗在19世纪中叶撰写《瓦尔登湖》（Walden, 1854），旨在探讨快速商业化时代中马萨诸塞州康科德居民的幸福问题。如今，一百多年过去了，梭罗所指出的问题不但没有消失，反而变得更加普遍和严峻。他提出的解决之道不仅没有过时，反而在当今数字时代更加切中要害。面对信息爆炸和高度互联的现代社会，重新审视梭罗的思想，可以为我们提供有益的启示，引导我们在喧嚣中找回内心的平静和对自然的敬畏。

本研究将EMPATHICS模型应用于对外汉语教学，结合积极心理学与Q方法论，通过对在沪国际学生的研究，发现影响学习体验的三个关键因素为主动探索、沟通共情和积极态度。研究结果表明情感/共情与自我构建维度对学习者福祉贡献最大，而意义/动机等维度仍有发展空间。研究基于EMPATHICS框架提出教学建议，强调培养学习者自主性、促进情感联结和保持积极态度的重要性，可为开发有效的以学习者为中心的汉语教学项目提供指导。

获取更多与本讲座相关的详细信息，敬请关注中国外语战略研究中心公众号“语言与未来”（ID: SISU_CCLPPS）的微信推送。

在与他人交流时，双语者可能会仅使用一种语言，也可能会根据自己意愿交替使用两种语言。无论哪种情况，他们很少会错误的使用非目标语言，并且很容易理解切换了语言的语句，在语言表达和理解方面都表现出强大的语言控制能力。单独对语言表达或理解进行的研究表明，双语者在这两个过程中依赖不同的的语言控制机制。然而，在现实生活中（例如在对话中），双语者常在在理解和表达任务之间来回切换。在这种情况下，他们可能会在这两类任务中使用一种共同的机制来提高语言加工的效率。本次介绍的几项研究着重探讨了双语者在不同情况下如何在语言理解和表达任务中适应性地控制两种语言。

When communicating with others, bilinguals may stick to one language or alternate two languages at will. In either case, they rarely produce the unintended language by accident and easily follow language switches, showing remarkable language control abilities in both language production and comprehension. Studies on language switching within production or comprehension suggested that bilinguals rely on different and separate language control mechanisms in these two processes. Nevertheless, it is common that bilinguals alternate between comprehension and production in real life (e.g., in a conversation), and in this situation they may use a shared mechanism across these two processes to improve language processing proficiency. In this talk, I will introduce several studies that addressed how bilinguals adaptively control languages across comprehension and production in various contexts.

Relying on labor unrest as a shock to local social stability, we show that state-owned enterprises (SOEs) react to nearby unrest by creating additional employment at the expense of productivity. Such effect is larger when labor unrest is in the exposed SOEs’ industries, local fiscal budgets are solid, governing mayors are better incentivized, and local private sectors grow slower. SOEs obtain more fiscal benefits. Contrarily, non-SOEs do not react to labor unrest, and their performance is unaffected. Various tests mitigate the selection effects of labor unrest. Aggregated results show SOEs can alleviate adverse economic and social impacts of labor unrest.