上外“跨、通、融”研究生教育质量提升系列讲座由研究生院主办，汇集国内外知名专家学者，共设有“科学与学术研究方法”“区域国别研究”“科技前沿与未来发展”三大主题。该系列讲座旨在提高我校研究生的学术水平和科研能力，彰显区域国别研究学科内涵，与科技前沿和未来发展同频共振，提升我校研究生的竞争力、发展力、持续力，助力研究生把握主动，赢得未来。

报名方式：扫描海报二维码参与

Sesión 1:   

 1.1 Cognitivismo: una ciencia de la mente. La lingüística cognitiva y sus escuelas.

1.2 Teoría del signo. Lingüística cognitiva frente a lingüística formal

Hora: 13:00, 10 de octubre

Lugar: Centro Conjunto de Investigación RAE-SISU(松江校区三教楼RAE-SISU联合研究中心)

Sesión 2:   

2.1 Fundamentos neurológicos de la lingüística cognitiva

2.2 La fractalidad. Comparación cognitiva de idiomas. Los componentes del signo.

Hora: 8:15, 11 de octubre

Lugar: Centro Conjunto de Investigación RAE-SISU(松江校区三教楼RAE-SISU联合研究中心)

Sesión 3:   

3.1 La sintaxis del español desde el punto de vista cognitivo. Métodos de análisis

3.2 El léxico del español desde el punto de vista cognitivo. Métodos de análisis

Hora: 15:00, 12 de octubre

Lugar: Centro Conjunto de Investigación RAE-SISU(松江校区三教楼RAE-SISU联合研究中心)

Resumen: El cognitivismo es un punto de vista científico sobre la mente humana que, aunque tiene antecedentes en casi todas las culturas, modernamente se inició en un simposio celebrado en California en 1948, el cual, desde el primer momento, adoptó una perspectiva interdisciplinar. Allí se reunieron lingüistas, informáticos, antropólogos, psicólogos, neurólogos, es decir, practicantes de ciencias muy diferentes, pero que tenían en común su interés por la mente humana. En este ciclo de conferencias se traza una breve historia de la ciencia cognitiva y se analiza el fundamento semiótico de la misma, considerando las dos perspectivas enfrentadas que han guiado su desarrollo, la que prioriza el sentido y la que prioriza la forma. Seguidamente se analiza el aspecto neurológico del cognitivismo y se muestra cómo su propiedad funcional más destacada, la fractalidad, es susceptible de servir de fundamento a cualquier idioma. Finalmente se procede a un estudio cognitivo monográfico de la sintaxis y del léxico del español.

共同体是英国历代作家文学想象的重要客体，也是英国文学史上繁衍最久、书写最多、内涵最丰富的题材之一。尽管共同体研究已经成为国内文学批评界的热门话题，但文学中共同体的跨学科研究依然有待进一步探索。命运共同体的跨学科研究旨在改变以审美为主的研究方式，以便全方位、多视角地探索社会群体的境遇和命运。詹姆斯·乔伊斯的意识流小说《尤利西斯》（Ulysses,1922）的每一章都涉及一门或多门知识体系，以跨学科方式生动反映了20世纪初爱尔兰中产阶级“共同体”的“道德瘫痪”。本讲座将阐述英国文学中共同体书写的历史概貌及其跨学科研究的意义，并采取多学科视角对《尤利西斯》中的命运共同体表征进行多维度解。

In today’s changing world, where teaching and learning approaches are undergoing substantial and inspiring reforms, the value of teacher professional development (TPD) programs is more apparent than ever. This is due to the fact that formal and informal professional development programs equip teachers with the skills and knowledge they need to adapt their teaching methods to new educational approaches. Considering this, factors prompting teachers to regularly attend to professional development programs should be uncovered. With this necessity in mind, many scholars have looked into the predictive role of different interpersonal and environmental factors in teachers’ intention to attend professional development programs. Nonetheless, few scholars have delved into the role of personal factors in predicting teachers’ willingness to participate in professional development programs. Against this backdrop, this inquiry addressed the role of two personal factors, namely growth mindset and enthusiasm for teaching, in Iranian English teachers’ willingness to engage in professional development programs. In doing this, three self-report measures of growth mindset, enthusiasm for teaching, and desire for professional development were administered to 311 Iranian English teachers. The survey responses were subjected to statistical analysis using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM). Results uncovered that growth mindset and enthusiasm for teaching can trigger Iranian English teachers to engage in professional development programs. The results of this investigation would be illuminating for language teachers, teacher educators, and educational authorities. 

日本学研究在世界各地的发展轨迹因不同的历史和文化背景而有所不同。在本次讲座中，我想探讨东南亚各大学日本研究系的各个方面，以展示地缘政治和文化背景与区域研究之间的复杂关系，并讨论这些不同的系如何为日本研究作出贡献。我将首先简要介绍日本研究系在东南亚的发展历程，并以一些大学和相关组织（包括新加坡国立大学）为例进行案例研究。我希望讨论的一些问题包括：该地区各个项目有哪些独特的特点？这些日本研究系之间的异同是什么原因造成的？东南亚的日本研究系有哪些可能的途径可以与东南亚以外的同行建立联系？

The trajectory of Japanese Studies in different parts of the world is different because of different historical and cultural contexts. In this lecture I would like to explore the various aspects of different Japanese Studies Departments in ASEAN universities to showcase the intricate relationship between geopolitical and cultural background and area studies, and discuss how these different departments contribute to the study of Japan. I will first provide a short survey of the development of Japanese Studies departments in Southeast Asia. Examples from a few universities and relevant organizations, including NUS, will be used as case studies. Some of the questions I would like to address include: what are some of the unique features of each program in the region? What account for the similarities and differences amongst the Japanese Studies departments in the region? What are the possible ways for ASEAN Japanese Studies departments connect with peers beyond Southeast Asia?

中国外语战略研究中心“语言与未来讲坛”10月份已经确定的学术讲座有：

10月10日

【题目】中国语言学话语体系的基本内容与建设路径

The Basic Content and Construction Path of Chinese Linguistic Discourse System

【主讲】赫琳（武汉大学）

【主持】赵蓉晖（上海外国语大学）

【时间】19:00~20:30

【讲座语言】中文

10月17日

【题目】国际组织语言政策的合法化机制
Legitimization Mechanisms of Language Policies in International Organizations

【主讲】方小兵（南京大学）

【主持】张爱玲（上海外国语大学）

【时间】19:00~20:30

【讲座语言】中文

10月24日

【题目】立法语言中的若干问题

On the language of legislation

【主讲】蔡宝瑞（上海市人大）

【主持】张琛（宁波工程学院）

【时间】19:00~20:30

讲座语言：中文

10月31日

【题目】多语危机沟通 Multilingual Crisis Communication

【主讲】李佳、张洁（云南大学、中南财经政法大学）

【主持】余华（上海外国语大学）

【时间】19:00~20:30

讲座语言：中文

获取更多与本讲座相关的详细信息，敬请关注中国外语战略研究中心公众号“语言与未来”（ID: SISU_CCLPPS）的微信推送。

King Akhenaton, originally known as Amenhotep IV, ruled Egypt during the 18th Dynasty (circa 1351-1334 BCE). His reign is notable for its radical departure from traditional Egyptian religious and cultural practices, making him one of the most controversial pharaohs in ancient Egyptian history. Akhenaton ascended the throne as Amenhotep IV but later changed his name to Akhenaton, meaning "Effective for Aton." His primary reform was the establishment of a monotheistic worship of the sun disk, Aton, in place of the traditional polytheistic beliefs. He moved the capital from Thebes to a newly built city called Akhetaten (modern-day Amarna) to honor Aton. Under Akhenaton, there was a significant shift in art and culture. The art style became more naturalistic, departing from the idealized forms of previous periods. This new style reflected the king’s vision of a more personal and intimate relationship between the king and the divine. The religious reforms disrupted the power of the traditional priesthood, especially those of Amun, who had been influential in Thebes. This led to resistance and unrest among the populace and the priestly class. Akhenaton's policies also affected Egypt’s foreign relations, as his focus on religious reform led to neglect in diplomacy and military affairs. After Akhenaton’s death, his successor, Tutankhamun, restored traditional polytheistic worship, and Akhenaton’s reforms were largely dismantled. His name was removed from records, and his city of Akhetaten was abandoned. Despite this, Akhenaton’s reign remains significant for its bold experimentation with religious and artistic innovation. King Akhenaton’s reign was a period of dramatic change and experimentation in ancient Egypt. While his religious reforms were short-lived, they represented a bold challenge to the status quo and left a lasting legacy in both art and religious history.