上海外国语大学作为“国家队”的一员，肩负着为祖国的外交事业培养接班人的光荣使命，我校各专业尤其是语言类专业为外交部、中联部、商务部等涉外部委输送了一批又一批的高素质人才。随着国力的日渐强大和海外利益的日益广泛，中国对外交人才的素质提出了越来越高的要求。为了适应国家对外交人才的新要求，让各专业尤其是语言类专业的同学更好地了解中国外交和国际形势，我们邀请校内外相关专家和在外交战线上的校友，推出外交育苗工程系列讲座。欢迎广大师生踊跃参加。

上海外国语大学作为“国家队”的一员，肩负着为祖国的外交事业培养接班人的光荣使命，我校各专业尤其是语言类专业为外交部、中联部、商务部等涉外部委输送了一批又一批的高素质人才。随着国力的日渐强大和海外利益的日益广泛，中国对外交人才的素质提出了越来越高的要求。为了适应国家对外交人才的新要求，让各专业尤其是语言类专业的同学更好地了解中国外交和国际形势，我们邀请校内外相关专家和在外交战线上的校友，推出外交育苗工程系列讲座。欢迎广大师生踊跃参加。

上海外国语大学作为“国家队”的一员，肩负着为祖国的外交事业培养接班人的光荣使命，我校各专业尤其是语言类专业为外交部、中联部、商务部等涉外部委输送了一批又一批的高素质人才。随着国力的日渐强大和海外利益的日益广泛，中国对外交人才的素质提出了越来越高的要求。为了适应国家对外交人才的新要求，让各专业尤其是语言类专业的同学更好地了解中国外交和国际形势，我们邀请校内外相关专家和在外交战线上的校友，推出外交育苗工程系列讲座。欢迎广大师生踊跃参加。

British intellectual history is characterized by the trend of liberalism, which originates in the late 16th century. However, as Britain stepped into the 20th century, its intellectual map was transformed with the rise of varied social thoughts as responses to the tremendous changes in the society. The lecture will interpret the developments on the intellectual history from 1950 to 2017 with analysis of the representative writings during the period.

成立于1952年，是中国最早成立的现代大型民族乐团。一直以风格鲜明、演奏精湛而著称，在中国民族音乐发展历程中，始终占有举足轻重的地位。曾经涌现了张子谦、陆春龄、孙裕德、顾冠仁、闵惠芬、俞逊发、龚一等一批声誉卓著、对民族音乐发展做出重大贡献的艺术家。
经过半个多世纪的发展历程，上海民族乐团已经成为一支拥有拉弦、弹拨、吹管及打击乐四个声部全编制的大型民族管弦乐团，创建了自己的专业演出季，录制了大量的民族器乐专辑唱片。与此同时，乐团还推出了许多公益性演出，为普及中国民族音乐不断作出努力。
立足上海这个国际大都市，乐团将海纳百川、兼容并蓄的理念融入创作和演出中，以“传承千年文脉、致力当代发展、彰显海派风格”为主旨，委约创作了多部当代新作，成为新时代的经典民乐作品；策划演出了多台主题音乐会，将民族文化、民族情感、民族精神融入音乐中，展现海派民乐的当代表达。其中，音乐现场《海上生民乐》，成为第十八届上海国际艺术节开幕式演出。
乐团艺术家们的足迹遍及全国和世界几十个国家和地区，所到之处均得到高度的评价和赞誉。乐团曾受邀参与2006年上海合作组织峰会、东盟峰会、2007年特殊奥林匹克运动会、2010年中国上海世博会上海周、 2014亚信峰会等系列重要演出，并为众多来访的外国元首和政府首脑演出，被赞誉为“最优美的中国乐团”。
1、合奏《步步高》《娱乐升平》
2、笛子独奏 《姑苏行》《喜相逢》
3、琵琶独奏《彝族舞曲》、《送你一支玫瑰花》
4、古筝独奏《渔舟唱晚》
5、二胡独奏《江南春色》、《赛马》
6、女声独唱《茉莉花》、《大地飞歌》
7、柳琴与乐队《春到沂河》
8、唢呐独奏《百鸟朝凤》
9、合奏《紫竹调》、《花好月圆》
*曲目及顺序以现场演出为准

The 3rd Annual “SII Research Methodology Development” PhD Course Series
3. Topics in IC Research 1: Intergroup Communication Approaches (3rd offering)
Instructor: Prof. Dr. Yan Bing Zhang, University of Kansas, USA
Course Description: This course is designed to expose students to important and influential international topics in intercultural and/or cross-cultural interpersonal, intergroup, mass communication. The role and mission of a communication scholar are to examine human symbolic activity as it shapes and is shaped by relationships, institutions, and societies. This work concerns the creation, analysis, and critique of messages, and devotes particular attention to understanding the ways in which communication sustains and erodes collaboration within and among local, national, and global communities.
These 3-4 sessions will focus on the Contact Hypothesis, Intergroup Contact Theory, and Anxiety/ Uncertainty Management. This course is largely “social scientific,” covering material from communication, social cognition, and social psychology (rather than rhetoric). We will briefly touch on social identity, identity processes, stereotypes, intergroup communication, communication accommodation, and intergroup contact to demonstrate the manner in which communication both affects and reflects our social group memberships. The objective is to provide students with the theoretical foundation to view various contexts of communication through an “intergroup lens,” to enhance their skills to both research and critically evaluate historical, present, and future social issues associated with intergroup and intercultural relations.. By social groups we mean large-scale groups: those where you might identify with somebody else because they are a co-member of a group, even if strangers. Of special interest will be cultural and age groups, though sessions will discuss all kinds of different groups.
The recommended articles seek to accomplish three objectives: 1). Students are exposed to research in one corner of intergroup and intercultural communication; 2). Students will familiarize themselves with the structure of typical journal articles using quantitative research methodology; and 3) Students will learn about the details regarding the conceptualization and operationalization of major constructs examined in each of the journal articles, some through groups; The focus of this group work is demonstrating the integration of theory, research design, and measurements (and explaining basic data analysis).

The 3rd Annual “SII Research Methodology Development” PhD Course Series
1. Topics in IC Research 2: Online Hermeneutic Methods (new course listing)
Dates: Tuesday afternoons, 3:20-7:30 (4 times 5 periods), Mar 28, April 11, 18, 25
Instructors: Dr. Inge van de Ven & Dr. Tom van Neunen, Tilburg University, Netherlands
Course Description: A key strategy for scholars in the humanities is the close reading of cultural objects: reading to uncover layers of meaning that lead to deep comprehension. Close reading involves carefully reading and reflecting on a cultural object, in which we pay special attention to things like characterization, the pace of the plot, the symbolism and imagery found throughout a work. It can also be put to use to uncover and engage critically with power relations that are inherent to each cultural object.
The current digitization of old texts and imagery, and the birth of a whole range of new, digitally native genres, however, poses new questions for the practice of close reading. This is exacerbated in the context of big data and superdiversity, in which it seems increasingly problematic to make inductive statements based on the contingent cultural objects that we study. It simply isn’t possible to read everything. Distant reading, in this context, refers to a reading method that relies on computer programs. The strategy represents an attempt at utilizing big data analytics for the purposes of literary scholarship.
In this course, we investigate the possibilities and pitfalls of a negotiation between these two approaches, and compare the different types of knowledge they foster. Students get to apply both methods to a selected case study, the results of which are discussed in class.

作为语料库语言学和系统功能语法研究的结合，社会科学与自然科学学术语篇中介入型式的对比是一个有效的切入点。本讲座具体地围绕着“V + that-clause介入型式”展开。主讲人将分别阐述J. R. Martin评价范畴中介入子系统的理论框架，Ken Hyland对评价性that的研究思路，然后推出整合的“介入型式的分析模型”。基于分析模型和《英国国家语料库》数据库，比较分析BNCweb学术子库下社会科学和自然科学学术语篇中V + that-clause小句评价型式的介入特征。通过对两大学科学术语篇中使用V + that-clause介入型式的源头（source）、行为（act）、方式（manner）和立场（stance）及其在补语结构中位置（role/position）的研究，揭示出两类学术作者社团在“作者-读者”对话中进行观点介入时所呈现出的不同语言特征，对揭示社会科学与自然科学学术语篇的介入型式特征具有一定的指导意义。本讲座对语料库语言学和系统功能语法等方面有兴趣的研究者具有一些启发作用。

本讲座主要考察分析以下几个方面的问题：（一）归纳整理英国中央政府与伦敦地方政府的文化发展战略、出台的相关具体政策与文化管理机制，特别是对文化战略、文化政策、文化事业管理模式与文化发展间的辩证关系加以具体分析；（二）重点考察伦敦创意中心的建设战略，包括考察相关政策出台的社会经济背景、直接或间接相关的社会团体以及所代表的利益、政策实施的过程以及效果评估；（三）分析研究伦敦在国际文化市场塑造自身品牌效应的有代表性的成功案例与具体策略，以及伦敦如何在英国外交和相关国际组织框架内为自身搭建文化交流与文化推广的平台；（四）调查分析伦敦文化产业的生产经营机制、现代文化市场体系、文化产业的投融资政策、文化产业经营管理模式以及产业创新能力。

参考书目：
1) 英国文化媒体体育部《创意产业经济评估报告》1998. Creative Industries Mapping Document, Department of Culture, Media and Sport.
2) Cox, Geoff, Joasia Krysa, Anya Lewin, etc, eds. Economising Culture. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia, 2004.
3) Durão, Fabio Akcelrud ed. Culture Industry Today. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010.
4) Heinz, Steinert. Culture Industry. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2003.
5) 毕佳、龙志超. 英国文化产业【M】. 北京：外语教学与研究出版社，2007.
6) 蔡尚伟，刘锐. 文化产业比较案例【M】. 北京：文化产业丛书, 2009
7) 大卫•赫斯蒙德夫. 文化产业【M】. 张菲娜译。北京：中国人民大学出版社，（文化创意产业译丛）